On 10 Mar 2014, at 22:42, Michael Snow wikipedia@frontier.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
Maybe. I worry that it is computer jargon - but perhaps what I suggested is historian jargon...
It's not so much jargon that's the problem - it's that nearly all websites are read-only, and to some visitors it will be rather puzzling why we should go out of our way to highlight that aspect for this one.
True. But is that a feature or a bug?
Thanks, Mike