...I think we probably could work out way towards agreeing to disagree on this one - but I also suspect there's some common ground hiding there somewhere!
Yes - full openness surrounding the length of time IP data is stored for may increase 'gamability' in some areas - it may also cause other unspoken, or un-thought of problems.
The benefits to doing so are in my view a bit fuzzier and related to big picture community health issues and an abstract concept of what's 'right' - perhaps it'll suffice to say for now that I currently believe it would be a net gain to be open, honest, and clear about this sort of stuff.
best,
Peter PM.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi, Security through obscurity is when the way the security is implemented is undocumented, it is not peer reviewed. If anything this does not apply to the WMF, the MediaWiki software and the policies as implemented by our communities. When precise details like how long are results from check user activity retained are public knowledge, the only persons who benefit from this knowledge are the persons who aim to game the system. When they consider that this information stays available, it will hinder their ability to make mischief. Thanks, GerardM
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, private musings <thepmaccount@gmail.com
wrote:
It's interesting that you mention 15 days, Jon - as I think the trend has been in the other direction - towards retaining information for a longer period - perhaps to better combat vandal accounts?
It was at one point communicated to me that IP data was retained for
approx
one month - recently it has been confirmed to me that IP data is now
stored
for at least three months - I'm not really sure quite what I think the
time
period should be, but I would prefer it to be disclosed openly - I don't really find arguments supporting security through obscurity wholly compelling.
Also - I'd like to confirm that general discussion of checkuser form and function appropriate to this mailing list? - I'm not sure of the norms around here, and it seems a bit... well... heated, and I don't want to
poke
anyone into further rudeness.
best,
Peter, PM. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l