On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 14:17, Achal Prabhala aprabhala@gmail.com wrote:
This is an excellent idea. However, to cut down on frivolous closure requests, will you also make more explicit on the page (within the policy) that requests for closure can *no longer* be based upon inactivity alone? My understanding is that langcom has quite a lot to take care of anyway, and this will simply forestall irrelevant requests that cause inadvertent panic, like in the case of Sesotho and Xitsonga recently.
Is this better? http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closing_projects_policy&acti...