we should not dumb down articles
Exactly!
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Henning Schlottmannh.schlottmann@gmx.net wrote:
Dennis During wrote:
It might be possible to rely on a population of academics as contributors but there needs to be a mechanism to make sure that the needs of our actual users have appropriate weight in decision making
Who are our actual users? Students are of course well known to use Wikipedia excessively.
But do we know how many professionals and other people from the general public use Wikipedia every day? One of the most active contributors to de-WP once told the story that he was at a pediatric with his sick child and the doctor used Wikipedia to confirm his diagnosis - of course without knowing that the father of his patient had expert knowledge on how this "second opinion" was written.
I met teachers, university docents, authors, journalists, lawyers, social workers, telcom technicians and members of pretty much any other profession, who rely on Wikipedia for a quick lookup of something.
My point is: We don't write for students. Our articles should be on a level where everyone, including kids understands the introduction and can find further information in the main text, but we should not dumb down articles to the needs of school curriculums.
Ciao Henning
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l