If I may bite back, the original outline of this filter, in a form not dissimilar to the one that lay at the heart of the referendum, was placed in the Wikimedia public space more than a year ago, on the Meta page devoted to the Study on Controversial Content -- and put in that space clearly as a proposal, not as a fait accompli. Since then, a discussion on its merits and demerits has taken place in a number of forums-- with literally -- what-- a thousand, more than a thousand public comments added?
Does that not count as a fundamental discussion?
Robert Harris
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:01:38 +0200 From: kim@bruning.xs4all.nl To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:09:13PM +0200, Lodewijk wrote:
I do however not understand why we are having the fundamental discussion all over again.
Ok, I'll bite. When did we have it the first time? :-)
sincerely, Kim Bruning
-- [Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment] gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72 5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l