How can someone rebut such absolute and perfect theorems? My weak doubts, hypothesis and views must surely surrend to such a bright parade of Eternal Thruthâ„¢.
But just a note: using the same behavior of phenomena you're trying to contast is, per se, a clear defeat. To be more clear, blind -because you obviously don't know *nothing* about their backgrounds- vilification of other's opinions is, incidentally, one the of the main instruments of "cultural" sexism.
Apart of rethorics there are several logical fallacies in your statement: *criticism I've seen here focuses on means rather than aims *gaps (both gender and geographical) are caused by our behavioral norms? That's a great news! I always feared it was an enormous series of deep social problems while it's just a bunch of rules on a website! *the topic hardly meets the definition of *effort to make this community kinder and more welcoming* *finally, the importance of the topic dictates higher quality requirement in process, not lower.
Seriously all of this recalls me when I read suggestions about decreasing gender gap with "less complex graphical interfaces".
Vito
2017-10-16 16:47 GMT+02:00 Ori Livneh ori.livneh@gmail.com:
Gnangarra admitted to deliberately using a provocative tone to get attention ("I chose my tone intentionally to draw attention to the competition"). Acting surprised that people were aggrieved is disingenuous.
On the topic of sexism: the underrepresentation in the Wikimedia community of every demographic that is not white men is such a stain on the moral character of the projects and a threat to their long-term survival. The ways in which this lack of diversity is reinforced and perpetuated by behavioral norms are by now so well-documented that ignorance and lack of malice are not excusable. In my opinion, if you are not making a conscious, deliberate effort to make this community kinder and more welcoming, you are part of the problem. All the more so when the topic under discussion is an initiative to engage women editors and improve the breadth of coverage of topics relating to women.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Vi to vituzzu.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to your email Yaroslav.
I'd just underline Gnangarra's original email wasn't sexist, it's so
unfair
to vilify criticism towards contests as sexism.
Vito
2017-10-16 9:33 GMT+02:00 Yaroslav Blanter ymbalt@gmail.com:
My (rejected) message below anyway. [CUT because of boring filter rule] Cheers Yaroslav
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe