On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 12:40:09 PM Pipo Le Clown pleclown@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on the road every two weekends, and processing pictures the rest of the time on my free time. I've provided around 8000 pictures to Commons, and helped to have pictures for articles like Cristiano Ronaldo, Roy Hogdson or Greig Laidlaw...
Just to read that I'm a fascist and an "anal retentive" because someone proposed a fucking picture of KitKat for deletion ? It was not even deleted, the discussion is still going on. And even if it was, the right place to go would have been COM:UDR, with a strong rationale, where people would have discuss it in a civilised manner. Not in this echo chamber...
So yes, one could say that the thread "was accusatory from the start, and quickly went to vicious". One could also say that this is a fucking disgrace.
Pleclown
To be crystal clear: I didn't link to the DR or mention the nominator because I don't actually care much about the individual instance. Commons is going to do what it's going to do, and whomever nominated it or comments in support of deletion is just doing what the policies of Commons is telling them to do.
The problem is a general one with the goals of Commons, what the community focuses (and doesn't focus on), as I said. I think it should be clear that the purpose of discussing it on Wikimedia-l as opposed to Commons is talk about whether Commons is doing a good job of serving as the media repository for other projects. Not about whether the nominator was correct in this individual case or something like that.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Austin Hair adhair@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, guys, let's all take a step back and remember [[WP:Civility]]. (Yeah, I know that's a Wikipedia pillar, but can't we all at least get on board with that one?)
The tone of this thread was accusatory from the start, and quickly went to vicious. Maybe everyone can try it again with a bit of AGF.
Austin
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 PM, James Alexander jamesofur@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Stephen, you are young and handsome, in fact rather dishy to my ageing eyes. Good for you. Keep in mind that your fellow volunteers might not have been born so lucky, and that being young and pretty all too soon passes into memory, sigh.
Fæ, this is not acceptable for the list (or for that matter on wiki). Stephen's neckbeard comment certainly wasn't helpful either but it's no excuse.
James _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe