Hello Rogol,
I think the process on this particular count already took place. We wrote a report in good faith. We responded to critique in good faith. We're making actual changes in good faith.
Have a lovely weekend. I really need a break. Warmly, /a
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Rogol Domedonfors domedonfors@gmail.com wrote:
Anna,
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:46 AM, you wrote:
[...] And I'm struggling with a process problem (not one of substance) that I don't know how to solve. I truly don't. And it's kind of killing me.
We (people who work and volunteer at the WMF) need a way to get feedback. We need a way to be accountable and responsive. We all want that. And I actually believe that we are all working in good faith toward that.
It would help us all to help you if you could indicate what resources you expect to be able to devote to this way of being accountable and responsive that you are working towards, so that we can match the scale and scope of our suggestion to what you will make available. When you write of it being a matter of process not substance, does that mean that you have no new resources to allocate to this new way of working tover and above what you have already?
"Rogol" _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe