Hoi, How do our users have the freedom to choose their own tools ? When they use MediaWiki, they are supported. MediaWiki is dependent on a stack of software that is open / free. This stack is essential and, MariaDB is part of it. Then there is free / open software used in extensions and stuff. There is software used for the management of our software, the WMF administration. It can be argued that software used on Labs may qualify but that is it.
All other software is not supported by the WMF and why should it. "Users" may choose whatever to produce their own open content but that is far removed from what we do and might support.
Yes we can produce another list. But what is the point; it does only list what we could support not what we will support nor does it provide any entitlement. Thanks, GerardM
On 23 September 2014 12:01, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, but the message is that to do open content is not mandatory to have open software. Everyone can release open content generated/elaborated with his own software.
And viceversa, who uses open software can use it also for "close" content. It's the same distinction that legally exists between software and content/data.
What I have understood is that there is a larger vision of open knowledge and a closer one. The same Wikipedia's articles are not clear.
Personally I consider the open knowledge derivative of the open software and a subset of the open software, but I respect the vision of the other party.
For this reason I am saying that should be defined who can receive financial support.
The importance of free software is not excluded (and I said that it's strategical), but the users have the freedom to choose their own tools and what can match their knowledge/expertise.
Regards
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Quim Gil qgil@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
The question is that open software and open knowledge are not so close
as
open knowledge and open data and open content, for instance.
Maybe I'm misreading the "not so close" part, but just in case:
Free software is a subset of free knowledge, and a very important one for Wikimedia since all our content is digital. Free knowledge run by
non-free
software is captive, as many open initiatives dismissing this point have learned the hard way. We can't take for granted that free software will
be
always available and maintained either. This is why we need to take the collaboration with free software initiatives vital to us as seriously as the collaboration with other open knowledge initiatives. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Wikipedia: Ilario https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ilario Skype: valdelli Facebook: Ilario Valdelli https://www.facebook.com/ivaldelli Twitter: Ilario Valdelli https://twitter.com/ilariovaldelli Linkedin: Ilario Valdelli <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=6724469
Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe