On Dec 1, 2007 2:52 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2007 10:00 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://blog.jamendo.com/index.php/2007/12/01/breaking-news-wikipedia-switche...
I've emailed the comcom and Jimbo asking for the first-hand details.
This is interesting. I, for one, have explicitly rejected the creative commons cc-by-sa licensing terms.
I'm splitting this out to a new thread because I think it's important and can be discussed now, regardless of the exact path that's taken.
What problem do you have with CC-BY-SA? Personally, I like the basic concept (do what you want as long as you attribute others, derivatives must be under the same license), but I'm not familiar with the nitty-gritty details. There were some complaints in particular with the newer versions of CC-BY-SA, which I don't recall, but which possibly could be addressed before the compatibility is put into place.
But, in order to have any chance of this, we need to get a list of complaints. What problems do people have with CC-BY-SA? I'm asking this of everyone on the list.