Oops. I meant, "we should _not_ represent it as an child protection feature".
Am 08.09.2011 17:21, schrieb Tobias Oelgarte:
That is true. But we should represent it as an child protection feature. It alone can't do the job. But it could help parents with children playing in the background and users that wan't to read about controversial content in public. One of the typical, frequently made requests, if i remember the reasonings of the WMF correctly.
Tobias
Am 08.09.2011 17:10, schrieb dex2000@pc.dk:
That's a property of any filter. But other filters may not fulfil the requirement for protecting against accidential display of images.
Sir48/Thyge