Andrew Lih wrote:
On 9/17/06, Walter van Kalken walter@vankalken.net wrote:
Andre Engels wrote:
2006/9/17, Christoph Seydl Christoph.Seydl@students.jku.at:
Jimbo Wales says: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons. I think a fair number of people need to be kicked out of the project just for being lousy writers. (This is not a policy statement, just a statement of attitude and frustration.)" (http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046433.html)
Dear Jimbo:
I challenge you to find me a reference/citation for:
''When walking on the major street towards increasing soi numbers, all the even-numbered sois are on the right side and the odd-numbered ones on the left side of the street. If for instance a new soi is added between soi 7 and soi 9 it will get the number soi 7/1, the next one soi 7/2 etc. It is also possible that soi 20 is far away from soi 21 if there are more sois on one side of the street than on the other.''
From the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soi
Is this sufficient? http://www.frommers.com/destinations/bangkok/0071024195.html
Interesting thanks.
Waerth