That would be a fair operational definition in our context, but it does not predict well for all instances. Cheers Peter
-----Original Message----- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Amir E. Aharoni Sent: 22 February 2019 10:39 To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Inisghts from a meeting with NGO representatives
בתאריך יום ו׳, 22 בפבר׳ 2019 ב-10:30 מאת David Cuenca Tudela < dacuetu@gmail.com>:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 08:27 Amir E. Aharoni, amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
What is our definition of knowledge?
In my opinion, the informal definition would be: all the information that the Wikimedia community allows into their projects.
OK, that makes sense. It can even be formal :)
Do the people to whom you speak have the same understanding of what our definition of knowledge is?
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com