Its an interest aspect of speaking generically to describe any issue that the demand for links turns a discussion from general to specific that says. Firstly I dont trust you, I'm not assuming good faith in your reason for starting the discussion. Then secondly it focus the discussion to one point ignoring the bigger picture issues, lets not look too deep we because we'll find some cultural/community failing we cant handle that.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 16:59, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 20:36, Vi to vituzzu.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Hard to tell anything without the relevant link(s).
For you, maybe. Others have already given helpful replies.
My question was generic, and not about the specific case I gave as an example.
I chose not to post links to to the example, both in order to avoid a pile-on, and to avoid us being distracted by the minutiae of the incident concerned.
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe