geni wrote:
On 1/31/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Which I should note includes removal of caption text which obviously is not covered by any image license. It's certainly true that in most cases the caption is meaningless without the image sometimes the caption text is significant to the article on its own.
I believe that removal should be done manually.
Really? Cool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_of_the_Philippines_government
Needs sorting out (deleting). Some of the stuff there could probably be tagged fair use but the rest needs to be orphaned.
Before you do that would you mind orphaning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Indusvalleyexcavation.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sistine.chapel.entire.500pix.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LowerFortGarry.jpg
Because that would allow us to clean out Category: Non-commercial use only images once and for all.
I've removed the last item since it is in the public domain, being more than 50 years old
Ec