On Dec 14, 2007 10:30 AM, Robert Rohde rarohde@gmail.com wrote:
This person was in a sensitive position. Can the Foundation offer assurances that her actions in this position did not cause any material harm?
Surely part of the current ongoing audit is to determine the answer to that question. Without the audit being completed, I don't see how the Foundation possibly *could* offer such assurances.
The possibility of a link between this person's involvment as COO and the subsequent delay in the audit is a troubling one and should be disspelled if possible.
The possibility that there isn't a link between this person's involvement as COO and the subsequent delay in the audit is even more troubling.
Why did Brad leave, anyway?