You are right and this is what it should be.
Anyways we must consider that the selection of the working groups followed more the parameters to select the "representatives" of Wikimedia than the "representatives" of Wikipedia's communities.
Basically the experience in Wikimedia projects has been quite neglected.
I have a personal feeling that the diversity has been stressed a lot but neglecting some parameters which are valued by the community and for this reason the community doesn't feel represented by these members of the working groups.
The comunity is perceiving these recommendations more likely a vision lowered from above.
On 24/08/2019 11:44, Aron Manning wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 11:18, Benjamin Ikuta benjaminikuta@gmail.com wrote:
It's obvious that you, for one, stand with the community.
Benjamin, this is not a clash between two opposing forces, albeit some combative elements try to "divide and conquer", and turn the community into two opposing camps. The recommendations are about the path we choose for the future, and the conversations are your chance to contribute to that vision.
Aron _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe