How is Wikipedia better than World Book or Encyclopaedia Britannica? How is Wikinews better than CNN.com? How is Wiktionary better than dictionary.com? The idea is that when Wikimedia starts a project, we're the copyleft alternative to the ideal corporate source we're getting information from. The information Wikimedia publishes is for all the people with Internet access, and eventually the entire world.
On 6/17/06, Lord Voldemort lordbishopvoldemort@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/06, James Hare messedrocker@gmail.com wrote:
The idea I came up with for preventing liability would be using
exclusively
verifiable resources for research, i.e. something like WebMD where
people
-know- it's good. I guess it was a mistake to call it a "medical
dictionary"
when it's more of a "guide to finding out if you have disease X and how
to
make it go away."
Okay, then how would it differ or be better than WebMD? --LV _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l