Thirded (if that is a word). There really is nothing to move, a database lock seems like the best idea.
Casey Brown Cbrown1023
-----Original Message----- From: foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Aphaia Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:37 PM To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Proposal for a procedure for the closureofprojects
On 5/1/07, Johan Bos skatinghacker@hotmail.com wrote:
That's a good reason for not moving anything to the incubator.
I think there are two options left: -Just lock the database (maybe with some instructions for a possible
Kanuri
speaking passer-by) -Delete the database
I would prefer the first option, because the language exists.
Seconded. As for Kanuri, I have found no good reason to move it to the Incubator. I have no idea which sense it makes to move its main page (it is quite similar with other dormant projects) to the Incubator, unless the Langcom would like to collect all dormant language projects once to it and lock the database. (There are several projects - at least over 50 - whose sole content is Main Page).
From: "Johannes Rohr" jorohr@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Proposal for a procedure for the closure ofprojects
Since the Kanuri Wikipedia (kr.wikipedia.org) has /no content at all/ (there is nothing in article space, save for the main page, which is English only), I still wonder, what exactly should go to the incubator...
Thanks,
Johannes
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l