Same reason I choose not to be on the "List of Wikipedians by edit."
Chad H.
On Jan 9, 2008 2:53 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Or pointless all around? If we were using it for some reason beyond snickering and ogling and a little bit of "Oh shit I post too much" then making it more technically correct would be key, but...
On Jan 9, 2008 2:47 PM, Michael Bimmler mbimmler@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 8:40 PM, Kalan kalan.001@gmail.com wrote:
2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).
By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real name" setting.
I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
Or is this technically more difficult?
Michael
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l