On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:36 PM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com wrote:
We already have a no censorship policy that makes various exceptions. For Example Paedophilia advocates get blocked on site on EN wikipedia. There may in the past have been a consensus against any change to that policy, but there hasn't been a recent site wide reconsideration of that consensus. DE Wikipedia had an overwhelming vote, but they may not reflect views on the rest of the site, and not being a German speaker I'm not sure to what extent their vote was a decisive rejection of the proposal that was then on the table or a rejection of filtering in principle.
Am I being dense, or are you being silly? Blocking advocacy from a site with a NPOV policy is a bajillion miles from being censorship. What? I am wrong? How so?