Hoi, Make a distinction. I have never seen a "confederate flag" at any of the Wikimanias. So at the event everyone is very much welcome. The aim of a Wikimania is to bring people from all over the world together to talk wiki, wiki in any shape or form. It is a Wikimedia Foundation event so it is very much MediaWiki and WMF projects that is on the agenda.
The aim of the Wikimedia Foundation is to bring information to the world. This means all of the world, not just those parts of the world where Western people feel comfortable. Bringing free npov information to the world is what we aim to achieve by going to all parts of the world. From an organisation's point of view all the reset is secondary.
Yes, it is best if everyone feels comfortable in coming to a Wikimania. When Wikimania goes to the Middle East, it has not gone to Africa proper. When Anthere says in her speech that Africa should be on our agenda, it is a step towards Africa. We do not talk explicitly about many things. The reason is imho simple; it is not what we are there for. This is what others deal with.
I am unhappy that people find that they are unable to go to Egypt. I am extremely unhappy that this discussion is happening after a decision; a decision that has been made and is final. What upsets me greatly is that the quality of the arguments about this issue, particularly about how foreigners are treated in Egypt, is of such a quality that the argument would be likely deleted in Wikipedia. We are talking largely about hearsay and the arguments of there not being a problem are at least as strong and better documented.
Thanks, GerardM
On 10/12/07, David Strauss david@fourkitchens.com wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
Can you guarantee the safety of a male-to-female pre-op transsexual in Alexandria or Cairo?
Do you have any data about the number who would otherwise want to attend Wikimania at an equivalent distance from home and expense? ... or is this just a made-up problem?
It's quite demeaning to ask people who face discrimination to stand up and be counted. It's objectifying, and it's not acceptable to allow discrimination even in the presumed absence of the target group. Often, a target group will silently watch and exclude itself once it discovers that the reluctance to accommodate its needs is being discussed.
For example, someone might object to having a Confederate flag at a party. If the response is asking, "Are there going to be black people?" then it's more likely that black people considering coming to the party will simply not come rather than object and come to an event where their interests are clearly second-class.
It's probably clear by this point that I'm not a utilitarian. :-)
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l