Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
Daniel Mayer wrote:
For the record, I very strongly support this. This is due to the fact that almost all, not just most, new pages created by anons on the English Wikipedia are borderline to complete crap.
That is simply incorrect. I do (or did, until this policy change) new-pages patrol on a regular basis, and I'd estimate no more than ~30% of new pages created by anons are "complete crap". Certainly no more than 10-20% ever warranted speedy deletion.
Your crap tolerance must be higher than mine. :) You also misquoted me; I included a range modifier.
Well on the Dutch wikipedia the crap range for anon new pages is way over 50% so I guess on the english wiki you guys are really lucky ;)
Waerth/Walter