How are the edit functions in Monobook more prominent than in Vector?
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:24:52 +0100 From: nemowiki@gmail.com To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Monobook was optimised for editors, Vector is more balanced between readers and edtors
WereSpielChequers, 22/11/2013 08:03:
But it would be interesting to see some stats on the relative retention and upgrading of editors who use monobook and Vector.
The idea sounds crazy, but yes, why not, let's test this. I believe you can put your thoughts on a Meta-Wiki Research: page, describing the background, the A/B test and the proposed analysis, and then ask the WMF to run it (preferably with the consensus of the target wikis, but it's not usually considered necessary for so-called experimentations).
Nemo
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe