On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:08:21AM +0000, Fae wrote:
It would not be an unreasonable corrective action to take their boastful claims at face value and stick dirty great COI notices on the top of every Wikipedia article about each of their clients; with a suitable explanation on every talk page pointing to the newspaper source until a credible assessment has been completed to ensure no possible conflict of interest has compromised article neutrality.
That would be fighting POV with POV. Better to go through the list with a bunch of patrollers, and just NPOVize the lot. :-) [citation needed] and all that. Check page history for misbehaviour as well.
sincerely, Kim Bruning