On 24 October 2010 23:40, ???? wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
Oh well that's OK then. One Encyclopaedia puts an fake entry into the work about a fictitious person (born in bangs, died in an explosion, whilst working for combustible), and that absolutely justifies having a site that boasts of containing the worlds knowledge, where every page can be turned on its head from one page request to the next. Whatever was I thinking? Of course the vandalism, POV pushing, and plain old altering of pages to 'win' an argument in the pub or the David Ike forum, is exactly the same as what goes on at the New Columbia Encyclopedia.
It's entirely unclear what it is you're actually expecting to achieve in participating in discussion here, either in particular or in general. Could you please detail what you want to achieve and what you actually expect to?
- d.