Birgitte SB wrote:
--- Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
VC should, also, take care about all things which are related to the community. This means that admins, bureaucrats, stewards etc. should be responsible to VC, not to the Board.
Admins and bureaucrats should be responsible to community consensus within each project. Perhaps certain community policies (i.e. EDP) might be required to be approved by the VC. The community as a whole might be tasked to find a consensus within X boundary set by the VC or fork. But individuals in these trusted community positions are not now responsible to the board nor should they be responsible to the VC.
Birgitte SB
I presume he is conceiving the VC as a super arbcom. That's not what I think the VC should be about, but many people do see arbcom as role of VC, and I respect that.
Ant