On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:55 PM James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
The question I have been trying to ask, going back years now in fact, is whether "empower" refers to the political power to secure and retain the freedoms necessary and sufficent to contribute to the mission, or some other kind of power.
Well, it's your lucky day: you're finally getting an answer!
WMF's de-facto interpretation of "empower" in the [[m:Mission]] does *not* include "political power to secure and retain the freedoms necessary and sufficient to contribute to the mission".
We do not directly solve people's lacking infrastructure (except indirectly via partnerships like Wikipedia Zero), we do not provide computers to billions of people who don't have them, we do not teach literacy to the illiterate, we do not feed the poor so that they may contribute, and we do not declare war on North Korea to free its poor people from the awful tyranny they suffer under, to enable them to contribute. The list goes on.
The concrete ways WMF worked to "empower" have been providing and maintaining the main contribution platforms (the wikis), auxiliary platforms (Tool Labs, Quarry, PAWS, Wikidata Query, etc.), funding for *Wikimedia-related* activities via grants, programmatic resources and mentorship, funding and support for international gatherings of the active community, and a few other things.
Your aspirational expansive interpretation (which includes paying editors to enable them to contribute, if memory serves) of "empower" has never been close to what WMF, under its various leaderships, ever considered appropriate.
Now that your years-long query has an answer, perhaps you can stop asking.
A.