Delirium wrote:
Anyway that's a pretty off-the-top-of-my-head outline of how to design a system that merges community consensus and sensitivity towards potential members who aren't politicians, so I'm sure there are better ways of doing it. I do think some sort of balancing of those goals is necessary, though.
Yes, that is more or less what I would have said, Mark. I agree with the general outlines, and share with you some uncertainty as to whether the exact details you outlined are exactly right. But certainly, something in that neighborhood.