Should a non-WMF project go for dual-licensing? I know this is a Wikimedia Foundation list, but the clarifications needed here will be helpful to Wikimedia people as well.
Specifically, I'm trying to understand whether there is a significant downside to dual-licensing - comments by Erik and others suggest there is, and this option is only being pursued as it was part of the agreement with FSF. I'm not clear why - this looks to me like an elegant solution that gives more freedom to the people re-using the content.
My question in full is here (but it seems to be a quiet page):
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Licensing_update/Questions_and_Answers#S...
Thanks.