Oh gawd. Shouldn't WiktionaryZ's logo be similar to that of Wiktionary? Why does:
http://wiktionaryz.org/new_logo
even exist?
Nick
BTW, they call the village pump the "International Beer Parlour".
On 9/12/06, foundation-l-request@wikimedia.org < foundation-l-request@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Message: 7 Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:55:17 +0200 From: "Erik Moeller" eloquence@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Logo Contests To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" foundation-l@wikimedia.org Message-ID: b80736c80609120755l56081d44g3c8461eb31d5268f@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 9/12/06, Delphine M?nard notafishz@gmail.com wrote:
Familiarity in that case is dull.
I agree with Delphine here. The one exception I would make is the Commons logo, since it has such a strong connection to Wikimedia as a whole. However, I find the Wikispecies logo disappointingly mundane, and cringed when I saw a "lamp of knowledge" design for Wikiversity in the Wikimedia colors.
Unfortunately, without divine intervention, the trend towards dull logos seems unstoppable. Which will leave us with an inconsistent mess, as usual. ;-)
WiktionaryZ, by the way, has its own unique logo design: http://wiktionaryz.org/
Look, it even has a lens flare effect! ;-)
-- Peace & Love, Erik