Has anyone mentioned what portion of the UCMJ this is under? At least reading it might give us a better idea instead of shooting in the dark.
Chad
On Jan 2, 2008 3:38 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
I think we're getting a little off topic here, and I think its an issue that is important enough that we should stay focused on the issues of key importance. Do we have a legal obligation (probably no, IMHO, but IANAL), is there a policy conflict in this area, is the obligation purported by these editors a fact? I think non-lawyers can probably review the second issue, but one and three require legal assistance in my opinion.
Nathan
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l