Dear Erik,
Many thanks for all the help and support you gave Wikimedia Nederland and myself over the past years. Whenever we had tricky stats-related questions, we knew we could turn to you.
I hope to see you at many WMNL-events in the future.
Enjoy the freedom!
Best,
Sandra
Sandra Rientjes Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland
tel. (+31) (0)30 3200238 (ma, di, do) mob. (+31) (0)6 31786379 (wo, vrij)
www.wikimedia.nl
Mariaplaats 3 3511 LH Utrecht
Op do 7 feb. 2019 om 11:22 schreef rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner@gmail.com
:
Many thanks erik and all the best!! One sentence in eriks blog post cited i found surprising. What type of modesty you guys were talking about?
"At Wikimania London (2014) I talked about how we should err on the side of modesty. That message never came across. I started to have a discussion on this within WMF but failed to bring this to fruition. My bad."
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019, 22:18 Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older
layers,
which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by
vandals
can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei.
Likewise
view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and
what
wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post <
https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he
gave
us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work
with
him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s <https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/
—has
been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven
by
curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities
that
most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing
the
growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues <
https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/1...
the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by
nearly
a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections <
https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/0...
or public health crises <
https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
.
He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169
visualizations
<
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedi...
that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts <
https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-con...
,
which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times <
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikime...
in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in
the
same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of
the
most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the
academic
field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to
learn
what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive
Data
Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe