I agree with what he said.
After looking him up, the only qualification I can find of this person is that he's on the advisory board, No idea, how he got there and for how long is his "term", makes me think that maybe there is a Cabal. Most places mirror his description on the Advisory Board page. I am tired of seeing the same names, doing the rounds over and over again, from groups to committees to fellowships to whatever that comes next.
Will anyone else from the Advisory board or maybe even the board, past or present members included, going to receive a "fellowship" now? Does it matter that they are mostly unknown by the community, obviously not.
E. Forrester
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:23 PM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Hi.
As Daniel noted in his earlier e-mail to the list, Achal Prabhala is now a Wikimedia Fellow.[1] I actually missed this announcement as it didn't hit wikimediaannounce-l or this list (foundation-l), it apparently only got posted to the blog, but that's not really here nor there.
There have been rumblings about some of the surrounding circumstances that I think warrant consideration and discussion. Achal is a member of the Advisory Board[2] but isn't very active in wikis/open source. A few questions pop up in my head. Is there a concern about such an individual being a Wikimedia Fellow? That is, someone who's not particularly attached to wikis/open source? All of the other Wikimedia Fellows have fairly strong editing backgrounds. The edits by Achal seem to be rather sparse: http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Aprabhala
More importantly, is there a concern about an Advisory Board member being chosen as a Wikimedia Fellow? Is there a conflict of interest there? Is there a concern about the appearance of impropriety?
Achal has a growing influence on Wikimedia, particularly its new operations in India. This has included being part of the hiring decisions, etc. This is more of a consultant role, making his selection as a Wikimedia Fellow even stranger. And his growing influence and power in such a big part of Wikimedia's five-year strategy is making people wary. I think conversation and engagement (on this list and elsewhere) would be very good in a number of ways.
MZMcBride
[1] http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=2748 [2] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l