Sure, Todd. But that is not actually in the Wikimedia terms of use. The terms of use say,
- Attempting to impersonate another user or individual, misrepresenting your affiliation with any individual or entity, or using the username of another user with the intent to deceive;
They do not say,
- Attempting to impersonate another user or individual, misrepresenting your affiliation with any individual or entity, or *using more than username* with the intent to deceive;
That whole section is about impersonating other people, making out that you represent someone you do not represent, etc. Silence as to one's affiliations and identity has always been permitted on Wikimedia projects.
Andreas
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
They are, however, avoiding scrutiny, as evidenced by widespread disapproval of their actions. That is not a permissible use of socks. The community expects to place more scrutiny on paid editors, not less. On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Andreas Kolbe" jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't follow to me from that wording, Nathan. The English
Wikipedia
for example allows socking to enable contributors to contribute to
articles
that they would rather not have their real-life name or normal Internet persona associated with.
User:John Smith is allowed to create an account named User:ColourfulCharacter to edit those articles. In doing so, he is not using "the username *of another user* with the intent to deceive".
There is no other user of that name. (The only exception would be if
there
were a user called User:ColorfulCharacter, say, and Smith's intent was to create confusion between the two accounts.)
User:John Smith is using a secondary screen name to obscure the fact that both accounts are operated by the same person. And that is allowed.
I don't even see that Wiki-PR infringed the letter of that section, as a normal person would read it. Just like John Smith, they did not use the name of some other user. They created multiple accounts. There was no
other
user whose username they used, or whom they tried to impersonate.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com
wrote:
Nathan,
I am unable to find a mention of sockpuppetry in the Terms of Use,
whether
in Section 4 or elsewhere.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use
I don't think there could be such a mention, really, given that
project
policies recognise a number of legitimate uses of socks.
A.
The term isn't used, but the behavior is clearly encompassed by the prohibition described in the "Engaging in False Statements,
Impersonation
or Fraud" - specifically "using the username of another user with the intent to deceive." _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe