On 22 September 2011 12:23, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 September 2011 12:19, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com wrote:
So is there a simpler way to do this, is there some flaw in this that would prevent it working, or is this the flying unicorn option?
I believe it was envisioned as working for anonymous casual readers as well.
There *should* be some way to at least have the no-images option for anonymous readers without ruining caching ...
Cookies? It would work on at least a per-session basis, I'd think.
One issue here is that if we make it registered-user-only we need to work out how this interacts with account creation - and IP blocks. It clearly will cause problems if people *want* to turn on the filter, go to create an account, and discover one of our famed cryptic block messages telling them they can't...