On 30 August 2011 19:35, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
..
Thanks, Bence. Given that the document that is creating so much fuss is *not* publicly available, and there are many references to "current" agreements without links to the version that particular chapter signed or authorized, I'd say it's still pretty hard for those who aren't actively involved in the administration of chapters to really know what is going
on.
The chapters agreement itself doesn't contain several of the points that
are
so controversial in this thread, for example.
It is also pretty hard for people actively involved in the administration of chapters to know what is going on, and why.
<snip>
Thanks for that comment, John. While I probably don't entirely share your own view (or that of many others) about the entire chapter/fundraising issue, I can certainly understand and sympathise with all of the people from chapters who are trying to figure out their next steps here. It must feel a little like walking on quicksand.
Risker/Anne