Folks: are we still playing with this toy?
I've sat here and watched this discourse – variously frivolous, slightly insulting, and embarrassing – and said nothing in the hope it would just fizzle away.
But amazingly, it's still here.
We have to accept that while crowdsourcing is the genius of Wikipedia and a few of its sister projects, it's totally inappropriate for choosing the executive director of a big, prominent Foundation that lives in a competitive, complex, and often negative jungle. There's a bunch of reasons for doing this largely away from the gaze of the rest of the world. Do I really need to spell them out?
It would be good to move on to more useful and practical topics.
Tony
On 02/02/2014, at 1:32 AM, Benjamin Lees emufarmers@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 3:29 AM, ENWP Pine deyntestiss@hotmail.com wrote:
Chad, I wonder if Rory has been considered. (:
Given his history of biting newbies, I'm not sure he'd be in a good position to help solve the editor retention problem. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe