On 05/09/2011 10:55 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
As to why no-one is distributing a "filtered" version of Wikipedia, I think that falls more under the general heading of "where are the major third-party reusers that anyone actually cares about?" - the non-existence of a commercial filtered version is less of a surprise when we consider the dearth of commercial packaged versions at all...
You'd think a "safe" version would be a valuable service that many would be willing to pay for, given the hordes of people beating down our doors demanding just that...
oh, wait.
-- Coren / Marc