On 04/01/2014 07:43 AM, Fæ wrote:
I find it disappointing that when difficult governance questions like this are raised in public, that some leading members of our community default to treating the concerned whistle-blower as a troll
I think, Fæ, that you will find that it's not the subject matter that is the issue so much as the manner. It is perfectly possible to express concern - even outrage - without being provocative and offensive.
That analysis and examination of that bad move would have been done just and quickly and effectively by polite inquiry than it would have with shrill cries.
We're an extraordinarily transparent movement; we don't need "whistleblowers" -- we need vigilant participants. Compare MzMcBride's approach to... that of some others on this thread, and you will see the difference between raising an issue and being needlessly provocative.
-- Marc