Dear Michael,
I find it problematic that you suggest that yourself or the Foundation would speak out against this, when the law in question is about terminating the access to those who have been caught pirating material in violation of set copyright multiple times.
This is problematic because Wikipedia has a huge plagiarism and copyvio problem that is caused by the same people that would come under conflict above.
This clearly would not affect those who freely license their own material, which is what Wikipedia and the WMF is about. I've donated thousands of hours and hundreds of megs of my own material and my own effort. I find it a slap in the face that you would then make such statements.
Sincerely, Jeffrey Peters aka Ottava Rima
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Michael Snow wikipedia@verizon.net wrote:
James Alexander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:04 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/ascap-assails-free-culture-digital-...
They're actually gathering money to fight free content.
We may need to do something about this.
- d.
I can at least understand them having issue with EFF and the like but the article is right: going against Creative Commons is laughable. How DARE
you
decide to release your own content into the public sphere, how DARE YOU!
/me
sighs
Creative Commons is actually a much bigger threat to their revenue stream than EFF is, which probably explains the animosity. ASCAP administers licenses for the music its members create, collects fees when it is performed, and distributes royalties to members accordingly. The fees also pay for the costs of administering the system. If the material is available through alternative licensing channels, it undermines the ability of ASCAP to make money off of it. It's the same reason that Getty Images won't allow photos they acquire through their Flickr deal to remain available under the site's Creative Commons license options.
The letter looks like garden-variety political fundraising where the money will mostly go toward campaign contributions for select politicians (no doubt with an eye on particular congressional committees). I'm not sure it will be used to hire any actual lobbyists or mount a specific legislative campaign, although we should certainly keep an eye out for further developments in that regard. If that does materialize, I'd be happy to speak out on it in a personal capacity, whether or not the foundation is in a position to do so.
--Michael Snow
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l