On Thursday 15 September 2011 01:43 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 14 September 2011 21:02, Achal Prabhalaaprabhala@gmail.com wrote:
It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that the world now follows the Wikinews model.
No, you're describing bare skimming of the unedited social media pool. Wikinews follows a process-heavy review model, so laborious that news dies before getting through it and contributors give up and fork.
The hazards of not knowing about how Wikinews works I guess :) But I think it would be right to say that Wikinews - at least in a citizen journalism context - was far ahead of mainstream media; behind Indymedia, but ahead of many others. And that the reason I haven't been to Indymedia (or read anything significant from there in a long time) is also possibly because it was ahead of the curve, i.e. ahead of the infrastructure that could have really enabled it?
Quality is important, but Wikinews seems to consider it important enough to die for.
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l