On Jun 2, 2015 02:08, "MZMcBride" z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Milos Rancic wrote:
On Jun 2, 2015 00:39, "Benjamin Lees" emufarmers@gmail.com wrote:
"Won't get a project"? Are you saying that new project language editions are only approved if the MediaWiki messages for that language are all translated already? (Maybe I'm misunderstanding.)
[...]
It would be useful for the sake of future arguments to have data how
often
people access to particular messages.
Directly related: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T65416#1042471. Though upon re-reading it just now, the specific wording used at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy is actually softer than I thought ("it is recommended" instead of a hard requirement).
Will read Phabricator discussion in the morning...
Regarding LPP wording, as I mentioned above, it's theory. Practice is pretty hard and was even harder in the past. I remember Robin and I were waging hard battles for every set we wanted to remove from requirements.
I am sure that's documented somewhere, but I forgot where. It should be somewhere on Meta.