Blame the wording of the survey for not be clear enough? _____ *Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos.*
On 4 September 2011 11:35, Mikael mikael79@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand: "I think it is important not to..." isn't necessarily interpreted the same as "I think it is not important to...". Which of those answers was meant by the respondents that chose "0"?
\Mike
On 04/09 2011 11:17, David Gerard wrote:
On 4 September 2011 05:33, Philippe Beaudettepbeaudette@wikimedia.org
wrote:
The committee running the vote on the features for the Personal Image
Filter
have released their interim report and vote count. You may see the
results
at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Results/en.
The bimodal distribution in the first graph suggests this feature will continue to be controversial (to say the least), with fans saying "we had the majority" and foes saying "there is clearly not a consensus".
So. What happens now?
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l