i must admit i havent looked closely, but could you give us an example of an image where the watermark can be clearly seen and is an issue?
regards
mark
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Chris Down neuro.wikipedia@googlemail.comwrote:
Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without the watermark.
- Chris
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi, As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As always, come up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other "rule; Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now. Thanks, GerardM
2009/1/29 Chris Down neuro.wikipedia@googlemail.com
As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have notified the user.
IUP
states that this should not occur.
- Chris
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton <
thomas.dalton@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth wknight8111@gmail.com:
Wikipedia would have to write some kind of special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist there.
We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't means Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!)
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l