Let me rephrase and elaborate on that point. Phabricator and MediaWiki aren't the WMF wiki. I think that WMF employees' proposals, comments, questions, and suggestions can be welcome for TCoC drafting. However, in terms of process leadership and in terms of proportion of input, I would like to see -- and I think that the proposal would be more likely to pass an RfC on adoption for the whole document -- community leadership of the process, and a greater proportion of community input.
Pine
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Erik Bernhardson < ebernhardson@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
A point I should make is that I think that Matthew and others made some good-faith efforts with the current draft. I would have proposed far less WMF involvement with the draft
One thing I just don't understand here, why should the people that participate in technical spaces more than most (because it's their job to do so) not be involved? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe