On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org wrote:
2009/9/22 Eugene Eric Kim eekim@blueoxen.com:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Pavlo Shevelo pavlo.shevelo@gmail.com wrote:
"Who will decide what the strategy will be, and what will be the decision-making process?"
this page explains nothing about (or explains in no detail if somebody prefers) how main stakeholder - Foundation will make decision about
Sue put this well. There is more than one 'main' stakeholder here, depending on your perspective.
Essentially, the purpose of the project is to develop a strategy for the Wikimedia movement, not just for the Wikimedia Foundation. What that means is that no single entity will be able to approve and drive forward the whole thing: individual players will drive forward the pieces that compel and engage and inspire them.
I will add two comments.
One difficult piece will be suggestions that aren't at the right timescale or level of granularity. And each major stakeholder will have to choose their short-term efforts aligned with that longer-term strategy.
For instance, the Foundation's Annual Plan is essentially a one-year strategy plan. The 2010 plan will have to be finalized before the final report of the strategy process, but will pay attention to its intermediate results.
And when there are mutually incompatible suggestions which have to be reconciled *for each party*, it will often be possible for different parts of the community and movement to pursue each idea. I think of projects such as Omegawiki that way - it is incompatible with what is currently implemented as Wiktionary, and is supported outside of WMF, but clearly pursuing the goals of the movement.
Mike writes:
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Read_the_Proposals_as_Videos_on_...
Now that is simply delightful.
SJ