Well, if we make it a new criterion, we shouldn't apply it retroactively. I understand there was a time when sources didn't mean as much.
As for the unsourced articles that currently exist, we could do some very long PROD deal with it -- articles tagged as having zero sources have three months to get at least ONE SOURCE for any part of the article before it qualifies for speedy. That's a generous amount of time.
On 9/30/06, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/30/06, James Hare messedrocker@gmail.com wrote:
Let's mkae a new speedy criterion: if there's no sources, nuke it. With fire.
On 9/30/06, daniwo59@aol.com daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
I have just deleted an article, [[Porchesia]]. Any admins are welcome
to
read the history. It was created in November.
Problem is, there is no such place.
Hmmm.
Danny
Are you suggesting that this is the proper solution to any {{unsourced}} article?
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l