Peter Damian wrote:
You take exception, in a thread which is explicitly about content issues in Wikipedia, with a post that makes unfavourable comparison between Wikipedia and one of its competitors. Why is this?
The post I was responding to was nothing but an assessment of a Citizendium article. It made no comparison, favorable or unfavorable, to an equivalent article on Wikipedia. At most it engaged in some speculation about what Wikipedia *might* have. If your intent is to discuss content issues in Wikipedia, then you need to actually explicitly discuss them. (Although I might suggest that you should familiarize yourself with some of our other mailing lists and consider whether another list, like wikien-l, is better suited to have this conversation, since foundation-l exists for issues related to the Wikimedia Foundation and the overall movement surrounding its projects, not just Wikipedia.)
--Michael Snow