On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 21:43, Philip Kopetzky philip.kopetzky@gmail.com wrote:
these are still rather talking points than specific visions of the future and it would be great to discuss them in that way.
Beyond what I have already said, I do not see any merit in discussing glib statements like "All change has negative connotations to some members of the community", whether as "talking points" or anything else
I would be happy to understand the thought process behind the working group's proposals, and to discuss that, if they care to explain it by giving a sensible and considered set of answers to the question "Could this Recommendation have a negative impact/change?".